Versions of academic freedom – Newfield contd. et recherche- création

Versions of academic freedom. Some jolly. Newfield in Ivy and Industry, taking me through substantial episodes (currently Big Science postwar, and the new hegemonic equilibriums between managed knowledge and “humanist” creativity, 120-130s), and a plausible, certainly original storyline. (His contribution: proposing this version, combination, around the elaboration of liberalism as craft freedom generating personal freedom in free experience.)

Painting tableaux of ages-of, where hegemonic blocks are readable (in their appearance of paradox, or compromise or mongrel/louche convenience), successively. Constructions of.
One I particularly enjoy, recalled for contrat while exploring an ulterior one, therefore presented in pithy conciseness (je parle comme Merton ces temps-ci d’obsession dans la fin avide de la traduction) :

Innovators fought economic determinism on two fronts. They carved out freedom for aberration, drift, idleness, play, and the misdirection of funds within and against management systems. Such efforts became slightly more common in industry after the extraordinary production successes of Lockheed’s “skunkworks” during WW2. But they were already common in universities, where the faculty retained their historic ability to hide in the bureaucratic maze. (130)

Il faut arriver, à historiographier à ce niveau institutionnel, social, et ethnopratique. Weapons of the. Flux fins du pouvoir et des pratiques en son sein ; sous son emprise.

👉 Ce qui donne aussi à lire, par le cadre proposé qui peut se glisser comme repère comparé vers passé ou avenir de la période en question ici : donne à lire, donc, la valeur des développements et mots d’ordre (et de satisfaction, appréciation, soulagements et bonheurs, retrouvailles sous aspects neufs) de la recherche-création 📌. Après, encore, l’épisode de la captation de la “critique artiste” dans la machine nouvelle du néolibéral, Boltanski et Chiapello, Nouvel Esprit du capitalisme, 1999.